Hope for the Future: Ding Dong, HB1136 is Dead

I haven’t been shy about my disdain for the new-look Republican Party. Most of that is centered around the presidential career of Donald Trump, of course, whose remaking of that institution in his own image is nearing the end of its first full decade; and his recent actions have certainly done nothing to dissuade me of that disdain.

Their painfully-cringey attention-seeking M.O.—own the libs at all costs, ignore truth when it’s not politically expedient, wear your corruption on your sleeve and call it “making America great,” ignore the will of the electorate when your donors don’t like it—hasn’t ended in Washington DC. That particular MAGA plague has spread across the country, to varying levels of success. And in deep-red Indiana, which boasted a Republican supermajority in every branch of the government long before Trump descended that stupid escalator in 2015, the state GOP faithful have been playing the hits; again, to varying levels of success.

In my home state of Indiana, this generally takes the form of the state taking aim at Indianapolis, the largest city and bluest dot in the state. In years past, it’s been attacks on our already anemic public transit and our already horrible pedestrian safety. But the latest expression of that MAGA M.O. against my city has been through a now-infamous bill designated HB 1136. The bill, innocuously named “School corporation reorganization,” is very intentionally targeted at the largest public school systems in Indiana by dissolving public schools in urban areas where charter schools are more successful. Since the GOP in Indiana (like in other states) has been diverting public funds from public education to charter schools for decades, driving public schools into crisis and forcing parents to choose charter and public schools if they want their children to have a meaningful education, this is essentially the legislative equivalent of the childish “stop hitting yourself” bullying technique.

Much has been written about the weakness of the charter school idea as currently implemented; about how for-profit charter schools are discriminatory in their admissions (some even calling them “modern-day segregation academies“), or about how they’re more likely to hire less-qualified educators, or prone to financial corruption and mismanagement of funds which can leave students without a school to attend when they go bankrupt. They also tend to reject special needs students, or expel underperforming students, or end up being run by would-be mobsters.

Locally, the charter schools in Indianapolis have had a terrible track record. More than once per year since 2001, Indianapolis has seen charter schools close for poor performance, for cheating on standardized tests, for using public funds on political campaigns, and for literally just…disappearing. Statistically almost a third of Indianapolis charter schools fail, but some of the ones that stick around employ draconian discipline for the most minor of infractions, and more than half of them perform significantly worse than their public school counterparts.

Despite all of this, Indiana State Representative Jake Teshka (who, it must be noted, represents no school districts who would be affected by his bill) proposed HB 1136 in early January, which would transfer control of the schools in five Indiana school districts to charter schools. One of those districts, Indianapolis Public Schools, is where my children are enrolled. We love our school, and almost all of the parents I know do, too.

Naturally, public outcry ensued. After IPS sent an email to parents about the proposed change (and the district’s fate under it), a parents’ advocacy group spun up essentially overnight, speaking in hearings at the State House and motivating other parents to act. The bill received a flurry of local press attention. And in our current political climate, you would be forgiven for expecting such action to do effectively nothing; after all, in Washington, they don’t. Honestly, in Indiana, they often don’t.

But this time, they did. Seemingly as a result of the overwhelming public outcry, the Indiana House Education Committee has declined to entertain the bill any further. HB 1136 is dead.

And it’s not dead because of something Democrats did (they hold less than a third of the seats on the Education Committee), though their voices in support of IPS and in opposition of the bill have been welcome. It’s dead because citizens made enough noise about it. At the risk of sounding maudlin, we did it. And that gives me a lot of hope about the future.

Now, is there a chance that its language will make it into other bills before the legislative session is over? Are there other bills that threaten my children’s beloved school, in one way or another? Is Governor Braun’s tax plan still threatening to pull funding away from a public education system that’s already severely underfunded? Are Republicans still trying to exert their control over the city of Indianapolis? Is there a possibility that HB 1136 was never intended to pass as-written in the first place, or that it was proposed as a way to sneak a less-awful but still-bad bill across the finish line?

Yes, to all of those things. But for now, HB 1136 is dead. It’s dead because we stood up to it. And in this world made bleak by a Republican party whose tactics I don’t recognize (or at least didn’t before 2015), that’s brought me a little bit of hope this morning.

INTEGRITAS

In 1939, the English Heraldic Authority granted a coat of arms to Joseph Edward Davies featuring lions, chevrons, a hand holding a spear, and a scroll with the word “INTEGRITAS” (Latin for Integrity, obviously). Davies was the third husband of Majorie Merriweather Post, a philanthropist, socialite, and owner of the Post Cereal Company after her father’s death in 1895.

integritas

She was the wealthiest woman in the United States for some time, and commissioned a lavish estate in Palm Beach, Florida. The 126-room, 110,000-square-foot home was willed to the National Park Service upon her death in 1973, in the hopes that it would be used for state visits or as a retreat for US Presidents. A “winter White House” of sorts.

The NPS was sadly unable to maintain the property, and in 1981 it was returned to the Post Foundation by an act of Congress. The Post Foundation put the property up for sale, and it was purchased in 1985 by a real estate speculator and businessman, who turned the estate into a members-only club and resort, then turning the management of the property over to his wife (interestingly, this owner would also eventually have three spouses). He also took a liking to the coat of arms granted to the original owner’s husband, appropriating it for himself against the rules of the English Heraldic Authority. Before deploying it as his own, he replaced the word “INTEGRITAS” with his own last name.

Ironically, Post’s home, named “Mar-a-Lago” (Spanish for “Sea-to-Lake”) eventually served the function she had hoped it would serve, when the estate’s new owner was elected President of the United States in 2016 and immediately began using it as a Presidential retreat. Also ironically, the man who stole a coat of arms and replaced the word “integrity” on it with his own name is now embroiled in one of the most conspicuously fraught combinations of scandals in US presidential history.

trump

It gets more interesting.  When Donald Trump tried to open a golf club in Scotland using the coat of arms, his application for the trademark was rejected because the coat of arms was not his to use.  So, when the club opened in 2012, he instead used a manufactured, unofficial coat of arms.  The new version moves the lion to the top of the shield, giving him the spear and the motto “Numquam Concedere” (Latin for “Never Give Up”); it also adds an extra chevron, and includes – I am not making this up – a two-faced eagle.

numquamconcedere

As my wife said when I discovered this story, “we really are living in a novel.”

Source for much of the information for this story was this New York Times article.

Things Donald Trump Doesn’t Know

This list is intended to be updated regularly as new information becomes available.

  • Donald Trump didn’t know that Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine in 2014, despite it being one of the most reported stories of the last two years, a major destabilizing factor for Eastern Europe ever since, and a contributor to the imminent threat of war between Ukraine and Russia.
  • Donald Trump thought that Brexit was a Scottish Independence referendum, despite the fact that Scotland voted overwhelmingly to remain in the UK during that 2014 vote, but voted overwhelmingly to remain in the EU during that 2016 referendum.
  • Donald Trump doesn’t know how to run a business.  Trump-owned businesses have declared bankruptcies four times, costing literally thousands of people to lose their jobs, and despite several bailouts from his own father. Despite (his own) popular opinion, his only major financial successes have been a few hotels and a television show. His failures, however, are numerous; in addition to the four bankruptcies, he has run nine semi-successful companies into the ground; no non-building property that he has ever taken over survived his management.
  • Donald Trump doesn’t know that the Constitution refuses him the ability to negotiate down the nation’s debt. And he doesn’t know that doing so would essentially destroy our ability to borrow money in the future (at best) or wreck the world economy entirely, plunging us into yet another global recession (at worst).
  • Donald Trump does not understand that the deterring factor in owning nuclear weapons is not in using them, but simply in having them. He does not understand that using them would (not could, but would) activate Mutually Assured Destruction responses that would destroy the planet. He has also considered using nuclear weapons in Europe, and is unaware that the president does not have the power to declare war.
  • Donald Trump is unaware that a wall between the United States and Mexico would alienate the government of that nation, removing one of our major trade partners and political allies on the world stage, and leave us vulnerable to attack or (again) recession. This is not speculation; the Mexican government has said as much.
  • Donald Trump does not know that leaving NAFTA would cost the United States 3.5 million jobs and plunge us into a recession.
  • Donald Trump does not know that the Constitution does not give him the power to “open up” libel laws and sue journalistic organizations that he does not agree with.
  • Donald Trump does not know that Hispanics did not come up with the taco bowl.
  • Donald Trump doesn’t know how to make a profit.  After beginning his career in 1976 with a value of around $200 million (about $846 million in 2016 dollars), he’s managed to increase it to $4.5 billion by today.  Leaving aside the fact that a little less than 1/4 of that fortune comes from tax subsidies in New York alone, and another 1/4 of it is the inflation-adjusted value of the original money his father gave him, if he had placed that $200m into an index fund (one of the lowest-risk investments available) and reinvested the dividends, his value would be around $12 billion.  The fact that he didn’t do that means that he’s not a good businessman, and he’s not even very good at faking it.

One or two of these statements could be slip-ups or bad info. But all of them? Advocating policy that would cause major recessions in three different ways, global war in two different ways, and at least two different international incidents, not to mention his clear disdain for the U.S. Constitution, do not in any way sound like “competency” to me.